Coverage of Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) cases in Nigeria presents a complex ethical landscape. While transparency and accountability are essential, protecting individual rights and ensuring fair trials are equally essential. This brief explores the key ethical dilemmas journalists face when covering EFCC investigations. One challenge is to strike a balance between the public interest and the presumption of innocence. Defendants are often publicly named and cross-examined before trial, which can damage their reputations and compromise their right to a fair trial. Journalists must carefully assess the potential impact of their reporting on the lives and families of the defendants. Another ethical consideration is the risk of sensationalism and bias. Oversimplification of complex financial crimes can lead to misinterpretations and bias. Journalists should strive to be accurate and objective, avoiding sensational headlines and one-sided stories that could sway public opinion before a fair trial. Furthermore, reporting on EFCC cases often involves the disclosure of sensitive information, including financial details and personal relationships. Journalists should adhere to ethical standards by protecting confidential sources and ensuring the confidentiality of data. They should also be aware of potential conflicts of interest and avoid reporting on matters in which their impartiality could be compromised. Finally, the role of the media in the fight against corruption is important. While journalists have a responsibility to expose wrongdoing and hold authorities accountable, they must avoid perpetuating harmful stereotypes or contributing to a culture of fear and intimidation. Finding a balance between investigative journalism and the protection of individual rights is essential to promoting justice and fostering a transparent and accountable society.